JANUARY 14, 2025
10 min read
Security breaches cost companies billions annually and can undo years of hard work in an instant. But here’s the good news: it doesn’t have to be this way. By embedding security into every phase of the development process—a practice called the Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDL)—you can protect your product, your users, and your reputation.
From working on high-stakes projects, we know what it takes to deliver software that doesn’t just work but also keeps sensitive data safe—even under the toughest regulatory requirements. In this article, we’ll explain how to integrate security into your development process, step by step, to build software you and your users can trust.
What Is the Secure Software Development Lifecycle?
The Secure Software Development Lifecycle is a methodology that embeds security into every phase of fintech software development.
Unlike traditional approaches, where security is often addressed after development or even post-launch, SSDL integrates security practices from the very beginning. This ensures that vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated early, resulting in safer and more reliable software.
To understand how software development and security work, it’s helpful to break it down into key stages. The diagram below illustrates the process:
- Requirements: Defining security objectives and aligning them with business goals.
- Design: Establishing a secure foundation through resilient architecture.
- Implementation: Embedding security into the codebase during development.
- Testing: Identifying and addressing vulnerabilities through evaluation.
- Deployment: Delivering the application securely and ensuring production readiness.
- Maintenance: Monitoring and updating to maintain long-term security.
This approach protects against vulnerabilities and creates a culture of accountability and trust within development teams. With S-SDLC, security becomes a core feature of your software rather than an afterthought.
Now that we’ve explored how SSDL integrates security into every phase of software development and security, let’s compare it to traditional development methods and explain why this difference matters.
SSDL vs. Traditional SDLC: Key Differences
The traditional Software Development Life Cycle prioritizes functionality and delivery, often neglecting security as a secondary concern. In contrast, the Secure Software Development Life Cycle embeds software security into every stage, identifying and mitigating risks early.
In traditional secure SDLC, vulnerabilities are often discovered during testing or post-deployment, leading to higher costs and potential breaches. SSDL, however, uses proactive measures like risk assessments, secure coding practices, and tools such as SAST and DAST to integrate security throughout development. Here is the breakdown of the peculiarities of each approach:
Aspect | Traditional SDLC | SSDL (Secure Software Development Lifecycle) |
When security is addressed | After testing or deployment | Throughout all phases |
Cost of fixes | High, due to late issue discovery | Lower, due to early issue resolution |
Focus | Functionality | Both functionality and security |
Testing | Limited to QA | QA plus penetration testing, static and dynamic analysis |
Threat modeling | Rarely performed | Performed early to identify and mitigate risks |
Developer training | Focused on coding skills | Includes secure coding practices and threat awareness |
Tools and automation | Minimal use of security tools | Comprehensive use of static/dynamic analysis and SAST/DAST tools |
Compliance | Limited attention to standards | Alignment with industry standards like OWASP, ISO 27001 |
Risk management | Reactive, addressing issues after discovery | Proactive, identifying and mitigating risks proactively |
Stakeholder involvement | Primarily developers and testers | Involves developers, testers, security teams, and stakeholders throughout the lifecycle |
Documentation | Basic functional documentation | Detailed documentation of security measures and compliance |
Time to market | Faster initially, but delays due to post-release fixes | Slightly longer initially, but fewer delays due to early issue resolution |
User trust | Potentially lower due to security vulnerabilities | Higher trust due to robust security practices |
The difference is clear: while traditional SDLC delivers functionality first, SSDL ensures that security in software development is prioritized from day one. By taking this proactive approach, you not only avoid costly fixes later but also deliver a product users can trust.
Now that we’ve explored why SSDL is essential, let’s examine the specific security measures that make this framework effective at safeguarding software at every stage.
How Security Measure Are Implemented Across Development Phases
Security in software development isn’t about a single tool or practice—it’s about adopting a mindset that prioritizes protection at every phase of the secure software development lifecycle. SSDL has 6 main development phases we mentioned above. But for your convenience, we broke it down into three key phases: pre-development, during development, and post-development. Each stage has unique challenges and solutions, all working together to create secure, reliable software.
1. Pre-Development: Laying the Groundwork for Security
Before a single line of code is written, we need to establish the foundation for a secure project. This phase focuses on protecting intellectual property, creating secure environments, and ensuring accountability across the team. Here is what we do at this stage:
- Controlled development environments: Developers work within isolated, virtual environments where source code is inaccessible outside the system. This prevents leaks and ensures intellectual property stays protected. For example, in a recent project with sensitive data, our team created environments where downloading source code was impossible. It took extra effort but eliminated risks.
- Access and role management: Security starts with access control. Not everyone on the team needs full access to resources. Developers have limited permissions based on their roles, reducing exposure to sensitive areas. Only admin-level users have access to critical configurations, with access protected by multi-factor authentication (MFA).
- Accountability and monitoring: Developers know they are working in a monitored environment where screen captures and activity logs ensure compliance. This isn’t about mistrust; it’s about accountability, ensuring everyone is in agreement regarding security.
Security starts with culture. Making processes secure might add complexity, but it establishes trust—both internally and externally.
2. During Development: Building Security Into the Code
When fintech app development begins, the focus shifts to embedding security directly into the codebase and workflows. Here’s where proactive practices make a real difference:
- Secure CI/CD pipelines: All source code is stored and processed in secure CI/CD systems. Access is strictly limited, and multi-factor authentication is mandatory. This prevents unauthorized access to the build pipeline, reducing the risks of tampering or reverse engineering.
- Code reviews and automated analysis: Secure coding practices are reinforced through regular peer reviews. Automated tools like static application security testing (SAST) scan for vulnerabilities within the codebase, ensuring nothing slips through.
- Threat modeling and encryption: Every feature is analyzed for potential attack vectors. If sensitive data is being transferred, encryption protocols like AES-256 are implemented to secure it.
- Case study insight: On a fintech project we worked on, rigorous SAST tools flagged vulnerabilities during development. Identifying these issues early saved significant time and ensured a robust final product.
Think of this phase as building a fortress. Every piece of code should strengthen the defenses, not create an entry point for potential threats.
3. Post-Development: Protecting Software in Production
Security doesn’t stop when development ends. Once the software is deployed, the focus shifts to monitoring, protecting data, and responding to new threats.
- Testing beyond functionality: Penetration testing and dynamic application security testing (DAST) simulate real-world attacks to identify vulnerabilities. This step ensures the software can withstand external threats.
- Data encryption and certificates: All data between the client and server must be encrypted using protocols like TLS 1.3. Security certificates validate these processes and protect sensitive user information.
- Continuous monitoring and training: Post-launch, continuous monitoring tools detect and respond to suspicious activity. Additionally, regular security training ensures the team stays up-to-date on the latest threat trends and mitigation techniques. For example, training on identifying SQL injection risks can significantly improve how developers structure database queries.
- Incident response plans: If a breach occurs, a well-documented response plan ensures the issue is contained quickly, minimizing damage.
Post-development security is like maintaining a secure building—ongoing maintenance and vigilance keep the structure sound.
To sum it all up, here is a brief overview of phases, measures, and results.
Phase | Key measures | Outcome |
Pre-Development | Secure environments, access control, and accountability tools | Protects intellectual property |
During Development | Secure CI/CD pipelines, code reviews, SAST, encryption | Builds a strong, secure foundation |
Post-Development | Penetration testing, continuous monitoring, training, incident response plans | Ensures long-term security and user trust |
By addressing risks pre-development, embedding secure practices during development, and maintaining vigilance post-deployment, you don’t just build secure software—you build trust with your users and clients.
Apart from usual security threats, read also about cybersecurity challenges in banking.
Now, let’s go further with security regulations that are also vital during software development.
Adhering to Key Security Regulations
When it comes to security, following the right regulations is just as important as implementing technical measures. Frameworks such as ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, and DORA serve as essential tools for safeguarding sensitive data, ensuring operational resilience, and fostering trust.
At DashDevs, we don’t just follow these regulations; we make them an integral part of how we build software. Here’s how we align with key regulations:
ISO 27001: Information Security Management
ISO 27001 is the global standard for managing information security effectively. It provides a comprehensive framework for protecting sensitive data, mitigating risks, and maintaining operational resilience.
How to comply:
- Conduct regular risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities
- Encrypt critical data using protocols like AES-256 and TLS 1.3
- Maintain actionable incident response plans to minimize downtime in case of a breach
- Monitor systems 24/7 to identify and respond to anomalies in real-time
GDPR: Data Privacy in the EU
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enforces strict guidelines for collecting, processing, and storing personal data in the European Union. It focuses on user consent, data minimization, and transparency.
How to comply:
- Implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) and multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Encrypt personal data and apply anonymization techniques for added protection
- Follow clear retention policies to securely delete unnecessary data
- Respect user consent and provide transparency about how data is used
DORA: Operational Resilience in Financial Services
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ensures financial institutions can remain operational even during cyberattacks or system failures.
How to comply:
- Build resilient IT systems to handle disruptions without compromising operations
- Conduct regular penetration testing to identify and address vulnerabilities
- Assess and ensure third-party providers meet stringent DORA standards
- Implement robust incident logging, escalation, and reporting processes
PCI DSS: Protecting Payment Data
The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) safeguards cardholder data and protects payment systems from fraud and breaches.
How to comply:
- Encrypt payment data during storage and transmission
- Use tokenization to protect cardholder information
- Conduct regular vulnerability assessments and penetration tests
- Enforce strict access controls and multi-factor authentication
Read also about PSD3 vs. PSD2 Regulations and what they mean for the payment sector.
Additional Security Regulations
- HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act): HIPAA ensures the confidentiality and security of healthcare data. We follow HIPAA by encrypting patient data and ensuring compliance with healthcare-specific privacy rules.
- CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act): CCPA protects consumer data and grants rights to opt out of data collection. We comply by implementing transparent data usage policies and providing opt-out mechanisms.
- SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act): SOX focuses on financial reporting accuracy and security for publicly traded companies. We ensure data integrity and establish audit trails for financial systems.
Our Expertise: Delivering Secure Solutions for Fintech
At DashDevs, we specialize in creating secure, compliant software solutions for highly regulated industries like fintech.
Financial Services Provider Platform
One of our recent projects involved developing a platform for a financial services provider with stringent security and compliance requirements.
We implemented a multi-layered security strategy tailored to the client’s requirements:
- Secure development practices: We built the platform in isolated virtual environments to safeguard intellectual property and prevent unauthorized access. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) and role-based permissions were applied to control access to sensitive resources, ensuring only authorized personnel could interact with critical components.
- Compliance and data protection: Advanced encryption protocols, including TLS 1.3 and AES-256, were implemented to secure data during transmission and storage. Robust auditing mechanisms and secure data management practices ensured full alignment with global regulatory standards.
- Testing and monitoring: Rigorous penetration testing simulated real-world threats to identify and resolve vulnerabilities before deployment. Post-launch, we established continuous monitoring systems to detect emerging risks and maintain long-term security across the platform.
Tarabut: MENA’s First Open Banking Platform
One more project to showcase our security protocols while software development is Tarabut. Tarabut, MENA’s first regulated Open Banking platform, revolutionizes online banking by securely connecting banks, fintech, and third-party providers. Its app has exceeded 200,000 downloads.
When entering the rapidly growing MENA fintech market, Tarabut needed to establish trust and ensure compliance with strict regulatory standards. With user data and financial transactions at the core of their platform, creating a secure and seamless Open Banking ecosystem was paramount. To address these challenges, we implemented a comprehensive suite of security measures tailored to open banking solutions requirements:
- Integrated robust encryption protocols to safeguard data exchanges
- Conducted regular penetration testing to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities
- Established continuous monitoring for real-time threat detection and response
These efforts not only ensured regulatory compliance but also solidified Tarabut’s position as a trusted leader in the MENA fintech ecosystem.
Wrapping Up
Therefore, incorporating security into every phase of the software development lifecycle is essential for creating robust and reliable applications. By adopting a secure software development lifecycle, organizations can proactively address vulnerabilities, ensure compliance with industry standards, and build user trust.
At DashDevs, we are committed to delivering secure and compliant software solutions. With over 14 years of experience and a team of more than 200 experts, we have successfully completed over 500 projects across various industries.
Ready to build software that’s secure, reliable, and future-proof?